By Walter Ferrer Santos, Alvaro Rittatore
This self-contained creation to geometric invariant thought hyperlinks the idea of affine algebraic teams to Mumford's thought. The authors, professors of arithmetic at Universidad de los angeles República, Uruguay, make the most the point of view of Hopf algebra idea and the speculation of comodules to simplify some of the correct formulation and proofs. Early chapters evaluate must haves in commutative algebra, algebraic geometry, and the speculation of semisimple Lie algebras. assurance then progresses from Jordan decomposition via homogeneous areas and quotients. bankruptcy routines, and a word list, notations, and effects are incorporated.
Read Online or Download Actions and Invariants of Algebraic Groups PDF
Similar group theory books
Within the final twenty years Cohen-Macaulay jewelry and modules were vital themes in commutative algebra. This booklet meets the necessity for a radical, self-contained creation to the homological and combinatorial points of the speculation of Cohen-Macaulay jewelry, Gorenstein jewelry, neighborhood cohomology, and canonical modules.
This atlas covers teams from the households of the class of finite uncomplicated teams. lately up to date incorporating corrections
The exposition of the classical idea of algebraic numbers is obvious and thorough, and there is a huge variety of routines in addition to labored out numerical examples. A cautious examine of this publication will offer an excellent historical past to the training of more moderen issues.
- Varieties of Representations of Finitely Generated Groups
- Groups, Combinatorics and Geometry
- Subgroups of Teichmuller modular groups
- A Course in Formal Languages, Automata and Groups (Universitext)
- A Basic Course in Algebraic Topology (Graduate Texts in Mathematics)
- Abstract harmonic analysis, v.2. Structure and analysis for compact groups
Extra info for Actions and Invariants of Algebraic Groups
Proof: Given an open subset U ⊂ X we define OX (U ) as the k– algebra of all the functions f : U → k such that for all i ∈ I, f |U ∩Ui ∈ OUi (U ∩ Ui ). It is clear that OX is a sheaf, and it follows from the very definition that OX (Ui ) = OUi (Ui ). The uniqueness is also clear and the assertion about the stalks follows from the fact that locally we are dealing with affine varieties whose stalks are local rings. 29. (1) If there is no danger of confusion we omit the reference to the base field k, and refer to affine atlas and algebraic varieties instead of affine k–atlas and algebraic k–varieties.
See Exercise 18. 26. Since the ideals of k[X1 , . . , Xn ]/I correspond to the ideals of k[X1 , . . , Xn ] that contain I, the closed subsets of X in the Zariski topology correspond to the ideals in k[X]. In particular, the points in X correspond to the maximal ideals of k[X]. 11 is Xf : f ∈ k[X] . 27. In the case that X and Y are abstract sets and F : X → Y is a function, define a k–algebra homomorphism F # : kY → kX as F # (f ) = f ◦F . The following definition of morphism between algebraic sets generalizes and is motivated by the construction of k[X].
Xn ] form a basis for the Zariski topology of X. Proof: The proof of this result is left as an exercise (see Exercise 7). 10, the Zariski topology in general is not Hausdorff. In fact, an algebraic set is Hausdorff if and only if it is a finite collection of points (see Exercise 8). We leave as an exercise the proof that algebraic sets are quasi–compact (see Exercise 9). 13. The Zariski topology when restricted to an arbitrary algebraic set of an affine space is noetherian. Proof: Clearly it is enough to prove this result for An .